Opinions, Intuition, Rationality. These three may be the gear-stick,
brake, and gas pedal for the vehicle of man. Yet already I may seem to have
made an assertion. And the rational mind will perhaps halt up and search for
alternatives to my theme. After all, there are thousands of words out there,
why pick those three?
Should Democritus have really stated that ‘Nothing exists
accept empty space and atoms; everything else is opinion’ (and fact finders may
well find that he said otherwise) then my intuitive mind instantly adopts the
image and can see how our constructs of language and labels create for us opinions.
Yet the rationality of ‘everything’ intrigues, for a bridge and a house and a
doll do not appear as opinions. As well, that ‘nothing exists’ appears to
discount ‘everything’. If we state, ‘Everything exists within space and atoms;
everything is subject to opinion’, we have what I hope is taken for infallible inclusion.
Ha!
The point is, acceptance of another’s statements is very
much part of the rapport of life; re-evaluating, re-directing, and adding to
initial impetus is a skill-set that may prevent argument, prevent a sense of
counter-productivity, prevent negativity. And discourse, as we know, is quite
different from argument. Discourse is the melding of minds within further
exploration; argument is the disassociation of minds within asserted
boundaries.
Einstein’s quote leads also toward further exploration.
Powerful images: ‘Sacred. Gift. Faithful. Servant. Honors. Forgotten.’ Implications
abound. Taken as read Einstein’s quote is a call to honor our Intuition and to
put the servant, the rational mind, back in its place of servitude. Nice. Yet
it is the last sentence that might give us reflection. “We have created a
society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift.” While generalities
generally suffice (ha!), there is a paradoxical limitation to the
pronouncement, given that ‘society’ is so markedly differentiated depending on
where one is; and the generality of our having ‘forgotten’ is self-evidently a
generality. Who, me?
Point is, generalities are a way of our being able to
express intuitive thoughts, and there be hardly a thing one can say that
someone else cannot rephrase more-better, or less-better, as the case may be.
Blind acceptance of other’s opinions is an anathema to the
spirit. It is better for one to examine, to evaluate, and to drive within the
music of words, senses, ideas, opinions, feelings, contentions, and pronouncements
of all. Argument is divisive. The skill of merging with the varied traffic of
life is to be able to adjust comfortably with patterns beyond one’s control,
but to wait where necessary, to overtake when safe, and to enjoy the journey. We either drive our own vehicles independently
within the laws of traffic, or we get driven. Taking responsibility makes all
the difference. And courtesy for all is
the real mark of the good driver, not he who roars off from the traffic light! Now
then, shall we go for a drive?
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thanks for your contribution, by way of comment toward The Health of the Whole, always!