"But
I hate the Olympics! All that one-upmanship. How do you integrate that?"
The speaker is agitated. The voice is argumentative.
I am at
pains not to appear pompous, and try the following:
"Integration
does not mean condoning, nor even having to like, but accepting. If everything
exists, already is, and may probably always exist, then integration is the
acceptance that it is so; it is the exercise of preferments within the process.
So we accept that there are the worst things as well as the best, and we
evaluate with non-attachment, as opposed to having attitudes of
arrogant-judgement, as we progress. We do what we can to keep the fox from the
hens, the murderer off the streets, but we do so with compassion for what is,
no matter what."
He looks
up. He is unconvinced. "You still get angry."
"Yes.
We are everything. But I am trying to become more and more responsive and less
and less reactionary. No doubt I shall be learning that for the rest of my
life, for reaction is natural, deep, atavistic."
"You
and your big words."
"Ha!
Interesting, aren't they? Atavistic is ancient-history, deep in the bones, in
the genes. It often is reactionary, based on our enculturation, our family,
parents, and our own habits of upbringing. It is the way the untrained and
inexperienced react quite naturally to every snake; it takes reexamining our
fears and our attitudes and our perceptions before we can reach out and pluck
up a grass snake. So too for very many reactions we have about a lot of things;
we learn them as we grow up. Racism, hate, attitudes, exclusionary group
values, arrogant-judgements, expectations that are..."
"But
if we didn't compete we would not have winners and losers, the better than, the
richer and the poorer, the advantaged and the disadvantaged. Life is just not
fair!"
"Yes.
Life is not fair. Accepting that much will go a long way toward being able to
allow things to be. One may wish to change things for the better, to contribute
toward the health of the whole, to stop the evil and the hurtful, to cauterize
the malignant and the diseased; but to have compassion for it all, as a primary
response, is the reason for practicing integration, of accepting life just as
it is, while nurturing its potential."
"Potential?
See, something is always good or bad, right or wrong, better or worse. And I
hate things that don't try to make things better for us, all of us, that drag
us down."
"Then
that hate will make itself felt. And that too is as it is."
"You
mean you're accepting hate? My hate? Is that being integrative?"
I nod.
And smile. But how am I received? I sense he thinks I'm pompous. Oh well. Ha!
Delightful, a humble Socratic banter, lets us feel the comfort of the new position.
ReplyDeleteThank you, my old friend. It is heartening to see your observations on my blog. Heartening to note that you continue with care. Always.
Delete