A
lifetime of loving has enlightened me. And yet there is more. Every growing
child is enlightened, to the degree that yesterday, last year, or even so long ago as last Sunday, there was
less clarity than there is now. Enlightenment is a process, not a product. So too
for love. Enlightenment and love are not necessarily fixated, habituated, but
an ever-growing inclusion, absorption, assimilation, acceptance, and
integration of past present future. Imperfect. Everything.
The
listing of: Patient, kind, does not envy, nor boast, is not proud, nor rude,
not easily angered, is not selfish, no record of wrong, no delight in evil,
rejoices with truth, always protects, trusts, hopes, perseveres, and never
fails, is Love. (Positively Corinthian, ha!)
Seems
simple enough. Yet if love is not a product but a flow of experience as we
mature, there appears to me to be Shakespearean-like layers of loving. Here's
the rub:
At first
there is the infant, so naturally needy that self-centeredness is not guiltily
felt.
Then
there is the school kid, so in love with love that loving is given to anyone
loving.
Next is
the hot-head, full of jealousy and control, even in the face of another's pain.
Then
comes the level-headed, full of expectations, prescriptions, and conditions.
There
arises the long-suffering, the sacrificed, the abused, the misused, obliged to
love.
There
becomes the not-quite unconditional, giving love, but wanting or needing it
back!
And free,
most mature of all, is the act of loving, sans hold, sans sight, sans taste,
sans having to be with the loved one, the dearest one of all.
A dynamic
spiral of the life's layers of love has an eight-fold eternity to it. We first
are utterly self-centered, chiefly unconscious of our effect on others. Then we
grow much uncertainty-centered, sacrificing our own needs to the family. Next
we are ego-centered, pursuing what we want despite the effect on others.
Fourth, we circumscribe ourselves to a greater order, eschewing our own
responsibility and submitting to the will of the gods. Fifth, we become
self-righteous, assured of our right, vengeful on our enemies, and controlling of
our loved ones as if owning them. (A subtle distinction here is in such love being controlling, self-righteous, whereas stage three is almost entirely self-serving.) And sixth we deem it
freeing to share love, equally, without jealousy, but ultimately actually with
a selfish underbelly of feeling thereby free to not be enslaved by the needs of
others. And then, seventh step, is the love that accepts unconditionally, gives
completely to the welfare of the other, yet is pained by its own sacrifice.
Eighth step is the dynamic and flowing letting go of obligation, expectation,
and is entirely devoted to the welfare of the other, but it hopes and wishes
for a future that may bring about circumstances of reunion, proximity, touch.
Ninth step, most sublime of all, is the utter and complete freedom just to let
love be, without an absence of the dearest love being a pain, hurt, want, or
selfish wish; free!
Graves,
Shakespeare, Corinthians. One takes from what is given. One balances in the act
of learning love. To be loving. To see the shadows and the interplay that so
pervades the imperfectly perfect feelings of love. A question of habits. A
question of perception. Being loving, being loved, and being in love are a
threefold treasure one can best honor in the self and in one's dearest friend.
Yes? Well then: So it is written. So let it be done.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thanks for your contribution, by way of comment toward The Health of the Whole, always!