You'd think we'd know better. But we persist.
Common sense is not what it's urged to be. The rallying cry, "C'mon
man!" does not necessarily provoke sufficient hesitation; sufficient
checking of facts; sufficient gathering of details. We tend, generally, to leap
as though we were angels from cloud to cloud. And very many clouds have no
substance. Very many clouds are but wispy and waspish and full of cotton-floss;
we best examine carefully their silver-linings. Yes, common sense is not a
thing to be taken for granted. After all, sensibility itself is often
predicated on the groundwork laid down by one's forbearers. They determined
that the snake, all snakes, are to be feared. They determined that the spider
(that-sat-down-beside-her) would get in her curds and way. And not all of us
have been taught (or have been made aware of) the distinction 'twixt whey,
weigh, or way. We learn from our past. So, “C'mon man; you outghtta know
more-better!”
What mistakes we continue to perpetrate! Lots of
hurt and vengeance and destruction attends our emotional reactions. We hardly
have time for response. Response is too cerebral, too calculating. It's not
instinctual, nor even necessarily intuitive. We indeed cry, "C'mon
man!" And we tend to have a gut reaction. Yes, we go from there. And so we
easily accept phrases like "battle-ground", "war-room", and
"enemy." But c'mon man, surely we can take pause to choose!
As I type the USA (all that North American
territory under the 49th parallel,) is slowly filling up, choice by choice. Two
houses stand divided. And the Red and the Blue pours in, blue ink drop by red
ink drop, to see who first shall reach that magic 270 number, and break the
tension in the withholding meniscus. Interesting word: men-is-cus. (No, it's not locker-talk.) It's the
delicate skin that holds back the bulk of liquid potential from spilling over
and pouring down the sides of a given containment. The combined States of the
USA contain a total of 538 electors. When a single person votes, that ballot
goes to their respective group of electors. These electors depend on the number
of people in the state. Rep by pop! Each state gets only one elector per
representative in the House, plus 2 for each senator. Who spills over first?
California has the most electors, at 55. Important to win California. (And
according to the pundits, North Carolina will make or break a candidate.) For
the populace of the USA, that 270 number is the determinate margin by which so
and so will be president, (or is that such and such?) And like ants, the
shuffling lines to the polling stations grow and grow. Confusing enough, eh?
But, c'mon man, get out there and vote!!
Thing is, history depends. A ferry captain
today, reflecting on a dramatic accident, said over my car-radio: "There's
a different point of view for each person who was there that day." Yes.
Our sensibilities are not quite so common. Yet we'd expect honesty and decency
and integrity and consideration and compassion and care and thoughtfulness and
even self-control from our leaders. We would think that anyone dedicating so
much of their time to the people would be altruistic, operating from the
highest of principles. But then, like the proverbial Camelot of Cards, the
whole shebang falls down. We do not always follow protocol. We do not always
avoid graft and corruption and deceit and selfishness. We do not always trust.
No, history, our own history, has taught us to be altogether more
common-sensical than simply to submit to blind trust.
If the ship of state is about to set sail with a
new captain at its helm, surely common sense would have it that we all (since
much of the world is dependent on the mercies of this particular ship of
state)... that we all be on board without undermining the captain? That we
rally behind that head and do what we can to help keep the whole ship, well,
ship-shape! Ha! But this is no laughing matter. It is clear that the starboard
side and the port side of ‘our’ USA would have the vessel split in twain. And the flags from the masts do not fly high
and proud, no matter what the result may be; for dissension, like a serpent
discovering itself shedding its skin, lashes at the very winds of progress,
simmering in anything else but common sense. Really? C'mon man!
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thanks for your contribution, by way of comment toward The Health of the Whole, always!