Thursday, May 24, 2012
2) Portrait of A Painter
Seeing things clearly is not what an artist really does. He is not a camera. Rather, it is the adventure of yoking variables together that marks him apart, makes him unique, for each brush stroke, like others' fingerprints, becomes a rendition solely manufactured by him. Ugly word that, manufactured. It has the sound of repetition and multiplicity and even precision to it, all of which is necessary if one is making, say, a specific spark plug, but if one is making a painting? Oosh! Trouble is, some things in a painting just have to be right. A person to recognize, for instance. And even though right, or seemed right at the time, especially after having spent most of the day painting at such a face, the next day's light bring renewed insight, and so one goes at it all over again. As such, faces have been scrubbed out and redone, twice, thrice, if not five or even six times. Right?
But life does not give a real person such chances. Real persons live from moment to moment and very seldom can one not throw the stone, once it has been cast, or retrieve the words, once they have been said, or undo that which has been done, once it has... Well, you get the picture. Only artists can do that. They wipe out the rock or place back an old owl, or do not bother to put in the tree, or like Deus ex Machina, redo a face over and over. And should no one have seen the first face, let alone the second or third, or fourth or... Well, should no one have seen them then the thing that was done is gone into the ether forever. No one knows. Well, unless you write about it. But even then the wrong face does not no never ever get seen. Unlike deeds. Or bad grammar. No. Never ever. Unlike what it is for real people.
Commissions are like that. Real expectations. If you ask me to paint the waterfront and I leave out this or that building, or do not put in the flag, you may very well ask me to redo the picture more better. People tend to like what they see, want what they saw, and wish for what they want. But artists tend to recreate. Once my own choice of the cafe or waterfront is done, independent of anyone else's approbations, I display it and you like it, or not, and you buy it, or not, but the thing is done. My work. My passion. Time spent in the exploration of a subject until I feel finally done. But no, not so for a commission.
The details of a commission can be very challenging. I am no photographer. I depict. I render. I give unto the Commissioner in gratitude; it provides! And when done I might be lauded for my interpretation, humored for my labors, or even perhaps ridiculed for my effrontery. The hours and time spent is up to me. The amount of times I redo and redo a given face, a robe, a frozen gesture, is up to me. And no one sees the progress (unless you happen to be my partner who leans toward the work and astutely, considerately, but firmly lets me know that it is not yet quite right.) How fortunate for me that I have such a second pair of eyes! Imagine if I accepted my own vision only, and gave up for wont of energy, or for want of surcease. Imagine if trusting only my own sight. Who'd take flight?
We are all like that, real people and artists. We have the fortune of being around others to help us see ourselves, redirect our progress, comment on our product, edit our missives, and promulgate our success. We each are really artists in our own way, the painter and the real person, creating of life a canvas that is left behind in the minds of others, visually or otherwise. And when finally done, do we not then in turn go do more?
Wednesday, May 23, 2012
1) Toward Innesfree
1) The Warp and Weave of Wonder
Even the most carefully laid plans contain moments of magic. They appear in the interstices of the very weave of our tapestries, such that the light reveals sight and meaning afresh, each time we revisit our intentions. Such is the sense of excitement despite their disposition as we five knights each prepare, from our different vantages, to journey to the side of Sir Simon. Disease interjects. Death overtakes. It rears as unexpectedly into the warp and weave of our ordinary meanderings as to take us by surprise, and yet we each know it is an indicator of the end for each, as indeed for all.
With the sad news of Sir Simon's imminent demise there began a mustering of the possibilities of attending his side. We were knights on quests of our own. We each are so involved in the daily grind of ordinary expectations that magic itself, sometimes, has to be of our own making. So it is with the warp and weave of anyone's tapestry. Without a sense of wonder coming from within there may soon seem no wonder to be found without. The moments pass us each by, and if years be the pictures by which we might recognize our passage of progress, and months be the paragraphs by which we might describe their progress, and weeks be the sentences by which we might build the images, then days become the very use and choice of colors that go eventually to thread the whole of one's life together. Magic, wonder, surprise, and even amazement attends the moments in-between. Hours and minutes are indeed of our own makings.
The Kingdom of Oz lies far off across vast oceans. Even those great and goodly knights, Sir Anthony, Sir Mike, and Sir Rob, who live within its very boundaries are put upon to re-organize their schedules, rearrange their plans, and make ready their hospitality for the arrival of Sir Justin and me, Sir Who. Five days, five knights. Five men who are friends and brothers all to Sir Simon, who awaits our company. We shall arise and go now, soon, soon enough, and go to Innesfree, where sadly Sir Simon, like a poem, awaits the presence of men such as thee and me, momentary though it must be. It is a place in the Black Mountains. It is a place to be placed in memory. To be set free.
It is not that the journey be secretive, nor concealed, nor clandestine that so dictates this somewhat esoteric missive, but that its sense of specialness be preserved. There are so very many contingencies attendant upon the journey that the complexity would become overwhelming were the numbers to increase. We men have known each other since boys. Well, if not known, then known about each other. We are all of the same age. We were all schooled together. We deeply identify with the culture and the history and the colloquialisms of a common country. Hamba Gashle is an understood wish. We go carefully with each other as we grow old, for we are alive to the sensibilities of what it is to have friends who reach back into our childhoods and see us for the men we've become, not so much despite the battles we've overcome, but because of them. We have nothing or little left to prove, except a commitment to our connection to each other, and with that a giving of ongoing care. It takes effort. It takes action. It takes constant communication. And it takes love. Or whatever else one may decide to call this feeling.
Soon. Soon we each shall arise and go now, and go to Innesfree. 'Tis a story for thee.
Monday, May 14, 2012
More than Marmalade!
There are
people in one's life who provide sterling examples of what life could be. They
are not necessarily always older than oneself. Many a young student has given
me clarity and insight into how I might rather have been when I was their age,
and indeed how I might adjust at my own age. And sometimes such lessons are
overt, direct, with intention, yet more often the lessons are by example,
gleaned from observation, and realized through re-thinking one's thinking. But
the true treasure of being with someone whose every moment is filled with a
sense of contribution to life, however subliminally, lies in the invigoration
that their presence gives one's soul. To see oneself as one might yet become,
and to feel inspired and privileged for the lessons is one thing, but then to
be directly known, loved, and cared for by such a person is a great privilege,
indeed.
Our last
house guest is 72 years old. But she might have been 40. Her energy certainly
matched a woman far younger than she. And it was not so much her physical
health that impressed us as her youthful spirit; a quality of "yes, let's
do that!" on any venture, a sense of "why not?" Then too, there
was her perpetual curiosity, the finding out of flower and tree names, the
checking of maps, the reading of my Oceanography book and then her delightful
explanation of the diurnal and semi diurnal tides that affect our Vancouver
Island location. There was the viewing of the memory album of her last great
trip, on which she'd treated her entire family to an Alaskan cruise, now
artistically scrap-booked for their posterity. There was also our driving up
Mount Douglas, and her hiking up the last rocky bit from the car park with my
wife to the very top, where one can see for 360 degrees. On coming back down to
me in the car they went over to the outlook over the harbor, realized that they
would not see the sunset from there, and hiked back up the mountain a second
time, just for the better view! Why not?
Jessie
Peters brought me her homemade marmalade. She came with love and greeting from
her family. She brought her memories and our swapped stories of her beloved
husband Vlc, and we reminisced a bit about the ravages of ALS, that awful
atrophy of the muscles that claimed Vic, that claimed our friend Hank too, and
that was the subject of the play I used to perform, 'Tuesdays with Morrie'. But
surmounting this disease is the ongoing vitality of a friendship that is
interested in the present, that is involved in our futures, and that
invigorates our consciousness. She asked me questions about psycho-geometrics
(my upcoming presentation on Dabrowski in Denver). Jessie wants to know.
We feel
blessed and privileged to know her, to share time with her, and to be counted
amongst her family as their friends too. The visits with her sisters and their
kin, as well as her daughter and son, and their kin, have been treasures of
themselves. One trusts that you too, reading this, gets to feel love and warmth
for the people you know who are not biologically your family, but who have so
connected with your sensibilities that there is a feeling of inclusion and
acceptance and love for their very being in your life. Marmalade tends to make
me feel that, every time I bite into it: marvelously grateful.
Jessie
Peters came for a visit. A mere three days. We took her back to the airport and
we felt immediately interested in when we might get to see her again. Jessie
gave us the most precious gift of all, her caring, considerate, compassionate,
and interested presence. So much more than marmalade!
Saturday, May 12, 2012
Greeting the Ghost
The
instant he saw her he was completely taken. They were both teenagers. She was
vibrant and vivacious and bigger than any life on the silver screen, and he was
huddled into himself in the dark, his face illuminated by the light from yon window
that into the soul of his youth did shine. Juliet was to pervade his every
sense from that moment on, nearly forty years ago. She became the ghost betwixt
himself and every current reality.
Olivia
Hussey, metaphor to all his aspirations, was innocent of his allusions. She
almost certainly could not collaborate with the spaces he carried for her in
his heart. And she certainly could not be guilty of the barriers he placed
between himself and all other loves of his life; as though he somehow would be
betraying that initial great love he had conceived for such Juliet as had so
stirred his soul. She became the glorious ghost attending his every venue.His grail. She
was the genteel spirit pervading his every sensibility of romance, connection,
longevity. As the years went by he wore her as constantly as an amulet; she was
there whenever he reached for her, and she was there even if he became absorbed
in something else. The effect of a ghost is like that, inescapable.
That
other lovers along the way were aware of her was seldom overtly mentioned. They
each perhaps knew that his essential insuperability was due to some other
monogamy instilled in him before their time. Juliet was a pseudonym seldom used, though her presence was perhaps suspected; like the saying goes: one never
forgets one's first love. And Juliet remained a ghost traveling in the chambers
of his soul, haunted his being. Everything he saw, he wondered if she too had
seen, been there, might see. If not in reality, their ephemeral connection was
more real than any filial or consummate attachment than anything else he ever
experienced. She taught him that love is about loving without ever expecting
anything back. The paradox was that in that very lesson he never did
reciprocate the love given to him by others, fully, completely. His love for
his Juliet was paramount. She was the epitome of his projection of what such a
feeling is, should be, ought to be, could be. And no other woman was going to
supplant that.
Shame was
his greatest downfall. Somewhere down deep he never felt good enough for her.
In his betrayals of his love for her, in his imaginings of how he could reach
her, let her know that he had constant thought of her, let her know that he was
growing in his successes, in proving his worthiness, in accomplishing
sufficient enough accolades and honors not even to be needing to pursue such
anymore, he was becoming older and older in his wisdom, his understanding, and
in his love. He reached a point at which he fully accepted that he might never
actually get to see her, let alone to touch her hand, embrace her, kiss her
lips. It was the understanding that his soul was connected to hers so entirely,
whether she knew it or not, that he could give her utter acceptance for
whatever her life was, her circumstances were, her being had become. He
discovered that love wants not, desires naught, expects nothing, and simply
lets be as is.
Sunday, May 6, 2012
Contrition
Sometimes
one does terrible things. And it's intriguing just how long it can take to find
oneself out. The bad or selfish or egotistical or arrogant or self-righteous
deed does not necessarily
register at the time, at least not sufficiently. I realized I was overstepping
a delicacy of social conduct, but the full possibility of its consequences did
not strike me until today, two months later. While contemplating those passing
below my balcony the quiet thread of my thoughts lead to a remembrance of the sad
incident, and I felt deeply, seriously, remorseful. My contrition, I'm aware,
might however be entirely speculative.
Two
months ago I met a previous student and his girlfriend at my local hangout. I'd
not seen him in over a year. They met me outside by my car, as arranged, and
they pushed me in my chair inside the restaurant. My usual table was free. My
chair fits nicely away from the people traffic. I do not even need to look at
the menu. I've taken many a friend there. Living on an island by the sea I bring
friends from the States, from Australia, from Alberta, from the mainland, and
from around to share my favorite place to be, to eat that is. I am a regular!
And it has often been the same waitress who has served me. A woman perhaps 40
something. She's seen me with most of my friends. But she's never acknowledged
my specific presence. Never quite seemed to see me. Yet I've left her
reasonable tips. I've been pleasant and polite and handed up plates to her, a
difficult thing for me to do in the circumstances. And on this day, with my
students, when she came to the table something of the proud Mr.P in me felt
like being acknowledged.
"It's
time we knew each other," I said. Instantly there was awkwardness. I drove
my point, albeit gently. "You don't seem to recognize me, yet I come here
often. I am... " and while I was finishing my little self-aggrandizing
introduction it was evident to us she was
embarrassed, but I could not withdraw the tenor of my missive. We
ordered. Someone else brought us our meals. I did not see her again. I remember
thinking that perhaps it was the end of her shift, perhaps she was caught up
with other tables, and that was that. But I confess, it has kept niggling at
me. I have not seen her again since then. But I
never did quite resolve that moment, did not admit culpability. Until
today, too much later.
Another
student I've not heard from in over a year just wrote. I finished my response,
made my coffee, went to sit in my favorite arm-chair with the balcony
viewpoint, and wondered why I'd not heard again from that other student and his
girlfriend I'd taken to the restaurant. And then I recalled my aberrant
behavior, thought of my needing the attention, of my embarrassing the waitress,
of her perhaps resigning that day thanks to the final straw of a customer being
rude, of her feeling awkward and 'less than' in front of my students young
enough to be her children, of her uncertainty and being perhaps pained by my
being in a wheelchair and virtually accusing her of not recognizing me. Of her
possibly feeling hurt and sad because she'd perhaps lost someone handicapped.
Of her being bereft and... Well, speculation is what it is, full of fanciful
imaginings.
Friday, May 4, 2012
Bede's Bird for the Bard
Bede's
Bird for the Bard
Dreams
have a way of disturbing the psyche. What is the significance? What is the
symbol? Why have that particular dream? Why have it as a recurring theme? What
began the subliminal trigger? How possibly does the dream and me configure?
Back in
history, before English was a known language, there was Bede. In about 700 a.d.
he authored the Ecclesiastical History of England. In one of his famous
passages there is a sparrow that flies out of a winter storm through an opened
window into the great hall, is briefly warm and protected, but then in
consternation at the goings-on flies out again. (Actually, it was a door, and
the passage is about the conversion of King Edwin.) But that sparrow image,
fleeting and disruptive, pervades my subconscious. I had to translate the Anglo
Saxon as an exercise in my undergraduate years, and the concept has stayed with
me. In fact, in my painting of Passing Through Too, the sparrow flies in
through the open window of the train carriage, flustered and fragmented in its
depiction, while all within are solidified images, surreal as is the work in
its entirety.
And now
there are my dreams. The sienna-colored sparrow flits about in a cavernous dark
burnt-umber colored hall, like being trapped in an old Colonial School prep
room, and it perches on the edge of a silver garbage can, or pecks about on the
stone-paved floor after crumbs. Indistinct others are reposing about, caring
little or not at all about its presence. In my dream I feel concern for its
safety. I see it adapting. I see it free to roam about, but still trapped
within the confines of the edifice. And the building, I am sure, is a
university or school. My compatriots are young people, teenagers, but there is
no sense of their sex or physicality, near as I can recall, other than that
they pose a threat to the bird by their lack of compassion, their possibility
for cruelty. At times I dream it to be on the floor of a corridor. At times it
sits on a window sill. But the window pane is opaque, glazed in the pastel of
pewter. And always, the bird needs someone to set it free. Me.
We travel
from one known into an unknown. We may become warmer, more easily fed,
protected from the rain, but we are uncertain, fearful of the indistinct,
suspicious of the movements around us. Vulnerability accompanies our journey,
our breakdown from the paradigm we know. Whether it is a trip away from our
home, our country, our familiar, or the simple intrusion of a stranger, our
delicate sensibilities can be so disturbed that an overexcite-ability of
apprehension can threaten to overwhelm, perhaps subconsciously if not overtly.
Perhaps our fears take the bird-like form of the flitter-flutter, found in a
place unusual, possibly life-taking. Cloistering. And like Bede's venerable
bird, we seek escape, even if it means yet once again out into the very winter
of our initial discontent.
It is
adaptability that most indicates intelligence. The facility to take on a sea of
troubles, and by not so much opposing them as integrating them, end them, is
the ability to fly above the perch of being caged in one place overlong. That
one may take flight is not necessarily so much a sign of cowardice as of a
desire for mobility. Perhaps it is the soul yearning to be free of the cage of
one's very bones, particularly if they burn and burn unendingly. A bird for
Bede, and a bird for the bard. Ha! What poetic license may one not take on
one's flights of fancy? To dream of a bonded bird again, or to fly free?
For full painting please see: WWW.RichardMichellePentelbury.com
Tuesday, May 1, 2012
The Code of Silence
Pecoste Trugg
taught me a valuable thing or two. His real name was Neil Anderson. Back in 1970, he shared my Solomon House prefect study at Pretoria Boy's High. Neil liked that exotic name, Pecoste. Perhaps his avowal one day to adopt it is why
I never found him again, or why at our Boys' High 40 year Reunion, October 2010, he could not be
contacted. In many ways, I owe him a thing or two.
Neil taught me the
value of words. "That's a powerful word," he would say, and I would
immediately weigh in, and revise my options. He taught me the value of body
language and the value of the smile; he advocated Dale Carnegie. He taught me
the value of accepting an other's and others' values. He was casual to my
formality, precise to my carelessness, and laconic to my intensity. And Neil showed
me the value of hard work, for he was almost always at his desk, intending to
study to become a brain surgeon. He taught me chords on the guitar, Dylan's
'Lay lady lay, lay across my big brass bed,' and Cohen's 'Bird on the wire'.
Though I still do not feel comfortable with the former, I cannot help but think
of my long-lost friend whenever I play and sing the latter. But of all the
lessons Pecoste taught me, the most valuable would be: The Code of Silence.
No, it was not
that rather debilitating boyhood code of don't fess up or squeal on another; it
was that experientially empowering practice of seeing to it that 'what the
right hand does, the left should not necessarily know'. It involved doing works
of good, of leading from behind, of living in the grace of an inner power
thanks to the self silently knowing it'd rescued the fallen bird, given to charity,
helped out another, or instigated a productive project without overt or known
reward for the self. In fact, without either of us able then to articulate it,
Pecoste was advocating the highest of mans' virtues in each of the very many epistemological models: the selflessness of action on behalf of others without
the need to be acclaimed.
Well, there have
been times in my life when I've been the recipient of such actions by others.
The essential lesson of leading from behind was affirmed for me during my
undergraduate studies in the late 70's in Canada, by Dr. Mary Richardson, who
pulled me aside and first introduced me to the concept of gifted education.
"True giftedness," she intoned, "is in the art of giving of the
self to others; it is at the top of every hierarchical model. Begin with
Kohlberg."
Well, Kohlberg began in me the acquisition of an upwards spiral of evolutionary paradigms, such as Maslow, Johari, Gregoric, Dillinger, Dabrowski, Clare Graves, and Wilbur's Integral Holonics. Each concept empowered me with yet more articulation, yet paradoxically, in the very esoteric mention of their models, perhaps they now leave you feeling lost in my wordiness, disassociated by my ramble. "Knowledge is just a tool," I can hear Pecoste Trugg remonstrate, "never presume someone without knowledge doesn't have the potential."
"But even more important than having a specific knowledge," Professor Mary Richardson would remind us, "would be to inculcate a sense of enduring interest in and generosity toward others."
Well, Kohlberg began in me the acquisition of an upwards spiral of evolutionary paradigms, such as Maslow, Johari, Gregoric, Dillinger, Dabrowski, Clare Graves, and Wilbur's Integral Holonics. Each concept empowered me with yet more articulation, yet paradoxically, in the very esoteric mention of their models, perhaps they now leave you feeling lost in my wordiness, disassociated by my ramble. "Knowledge is just a tool," I can hear Pecoste Trugg remonstrate, "never presume someone without knowledge doesn't have the potential."
"But even more important than having a specific knowledge," Professor Mary Richardson would remind us, "would be to inculcate a sense of enduring interest in and generosity toward others."
Well, as the continuing
recipient of such generosity, I am humbled, grateful, and indebted. I owe a thing or two, indeed.
The code of silence? Pay it forward.
The code of silence? Pay it forward.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)




