Not
all shadows are harmful. We each carry them around inside us, wherever we are,
even at night. (Perhaps, especially at night.) Some would call them our
subconscious. Others might call them our Angels and Devils. Most would
acknowledge that we each have these unleavened, unfulfilled, unrealized wants
and needs that drive us habitually to repeat the same kind of actions, over and
over again. The shadow does not necessarily always follow. Often, it can lead.
It's
the Jungian shadow I'm talking about (hereby made up by me as an A and C side,
with a B and D underside of the self). It is one's Attractiveness and one's
Character that another sees, (and that we somewhat see in ourselves too.) And
if my A and C sides resonate with yours, we easily may make friends,
companions, lovers. Yet beneath each of these obvious precepts lies the shadow,
that which drives my subconscious, my B and D undersides. I may be developed or
mature or insightful or perspicacious enough to divine much of my inner shadow-self,
and thereby my B side may become Bountiful, instead of Bad; as may my D side become
Dauntless, instead of Deathly.
Now,
since I am the one writing, I get to create at will the terminology to explain
the Jungian concept. His actual precepts are fairly easily understood. We have
an established A side, and a usually somewhat hidden B shadow-side. The A is
that which you see (and like, or dislike.) Her A is 20, blonde, female, articulate,
and attractive. His A is 23, male, tall, educated, a stud, and keen for a date.
And off they go into the sunset to live happily after ever. But, there's a
catch.
Our
B sides, the shadow sides, are not yet (if ever) unleavened, realized,
fulfilled. The blonde did not have a daddy and always is looking for an older
and wise(r) man. The stud happened to have a shrew for a mother and so is
hyper-sensitive to the slightest of criticisms. And so forth.
Complex,
ain't it?
Yet
we can see that our B sides are not necessarily ‘bad’. We may find ourselves
always wanting to be the very best we can be; always trying to prove ourselves;
and always feeling insecure as a result of the lack of parental unconditional
love. And the things we therefore ‘do’ are (and can be) so good because of it!
Then too, we may find ourselves always shopping; needing more; cramming our spaces
with things we really do not need; all because we did not receive these things
as children; or they were taken away; broken by others; ruined. And though not ‘bad’,
we do find ourselves overspending on things that might more readily have gone
into something, well, grander than what we actually have, had we only saved
sufficiently, or invested, but...
And
then again, we can see that out B sides might be very bad indeed.
Like
the man who killed the Canadian Mountie this month. What awful hole in him needed
to be filled before he chose such an action? On scales of predominant sole-survivalist
living; or feeling bound by family constellations and expectations; or feeling
the self aggrandizement necessary to compete just to win; or feeling the pain-body
of a cultural composition so strongly that the wrongs of history cannot be
overcome; or needing to manage and dictate to others the ideals held within the
self; or even of determining that everyone who does not think like oneself is
an idiot; what great hole in this fellow needed so to be filled that he would
choose to shoot up parliament?
Guy
Fawkes bears a long shadow. So does Benedict Arnold. Yet we harbour shadowed ‘things’;
he; she; they; and us. We each know somewhere deep in ourselves there is a want
that may even become a need that we keep trying to feed, albeit but a nameless
shadow that creeps and slinks and heels at our sides, whether or not in the
full light of day. And we stand on guard, glorious and free, or not. Our
shadows indeed may be beautiful, or not. At issue is our bringing them to
light.
[photo by Len Wagg as posted on Facebook]